What are your views on improvement in NT-proBNP but no improvement in clinical endpoints?

Dr Januzzi: NT-proBNP changes from minute to minute, from hour to hour. The studies that have shown improvement in NT-proBNP but no improvement in clinical endpoints were studies that gave a short -term treatment. For example, Levosimendan (calcium sensitizer) given for a week, shows the NT-proBNP decrease, but then the endpoints were a month later or six months later. The problem is that an early change in NT-proBNP if you stop the therapy is not going to predict outcomes a month or six months later. You need an NT-proBNP at that same time point in order to say that it is or it is not predictive. So early changes in NT-proBNP only matter if you keep the therapy going eg Levosimendan. There were data from the ATMOSPHERE trial, looking at Aliskiren (direct Renin inhibitor) that showed small reductions in NT-proBNP. Small reductions are associated with small benefits. In reduced EF heart failure, the NT-proBNP changes are quite predictive.

Updates from Leading Experts

STRONG-HF: Post-discharge Heart Failure Management and Implementation of GDMT Heart Failure Therapy

Prof Alexandre Mebazaa shares the key results and highlights from the STRONG-HF study that assessed the safety, tolerability of optimization of guideline directed medical therapy. [...]

Read...

CANVAS study: NT-proBNP and CVD risk reduction

Can you give us a short description of the CANVAS program? The CANVAS program was a set of two trials, whose goal was to evaluate the role of an SGLT2...

1 July 2021
Dr James L Januzzi